On 06/06/16, Maurice Kinal said the following...
 
 MK> Should we try it with a direct netmail to you?  

Can do anytime.

 MK> If it works then I'm inclined to use it since it has no datetime stamp so
 MK> it makes it very easy to deploy once it has been created for any
 MK> particular node.  Type 2 and 2+ have far too much useless crap to
 MK> generate every time a pktheader needs to be created.  With 2.2 I am
 MK> thinking it could be a pregenerated field within a configuration file for
 MK> tossing and/or packing purposes.

I'm not familiar with the different pkt types but it sounds like 2.2 is a
good choice. Simpler is always better.

 MK> What version does Mystic use by default?

2+ is always used by mystic. A choice of what pkt type may be in the future
since we are working on a couple of strange issues at the moment. A 2.2 pkt
might solve that but we need to get more input and look at the details.

 Ttyl :-),
         Al

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A17 (Linux)