> How dare you call me a slut! :) I imagine you meant to say
> salut?
I wonder why english people complains about this word. Maybe it has a diffent
sense?
> I posted it to you in another message, but I'll post it
> again, perhaps you
> didn't receive the program. The program just hooks the timer
> ticker and
> toggles the Scroll-Lock LED on/off about every second.
Okay, i didn't think it was this program. It works as its supposed to.
But true about every second because multitasking software has already hooked
the tick timer so its blinking sometime 1/2 sec or 2 sec.
But say about a program once activated (hot-key) is waiting for some other
keys in a menu. The background program in this task should die (pause) until
the activated program gives back the control to the keyboard interrupt.
It is the way that most of programs work?
Or the background program should not die because the activated program
gives back the control to the keyboard interrupt and waiting for some more
input. Leaving the background program running correctly.
In that case, the screen would have been overwritten by the background task?
I could said wrong. I am just thinking.
> You're welcome, hope they helped in one way or another.
Yes, this discussion quite interesting :-)
s
---
---------------
* Origin: Silicon Palace {514}432-2953 Lafontaine, Qu‚bec (1:242/100)
|