(greg1199{at}yahoo.com) writes:
> Saggy vomited:
>> "Andre Lieven"  wrote in message
>> news:cvqak4$s98$1{at}theodyn.ncf.ca...
>> >
>> > "Aggy" (Aggy2005{at}hotmail.com) exposes her sexism
and ignorance all
>> > the more... :
>> *Bollocks all Discarded*

No proof offered ? Claim... fails.

>> Oh come now Andre babe. You don't care if I'm a feminist or not. I'm
>> a women

LOL ! Theres proof of Saggy's schitzophrenia...

>> is all that matters to you.
>
> Andre can speak for himself, and you can bleat for yourself.

Yep. I've plonked the sexist cunt, because she is a sexist waste
of skin.

>> Evidence shows you don't know what a feminist is

No proof offered ? Claim... fails.

> The definition of "feminist" is so muddled by bad writers
like yourself
> that there's no point in using it.  If you could defend the criticisms
> of it, you wouldn't protect it by calling its definition into question.
> But you're too incompetent to copy _Green Eggs and Ham_ in crayon, let
> alone write a decent rebuttal.

Indeed, and even she knows that, as shes never even attempted to try
to write one...

>> not even if you met one and I suspect you never have. You are just
>> another example of a bleating weak male



> Weak?  Go call him out, tough grrrl.  Maybe you'll get a free nose job.

LOL ! Well, I'd do worse than that: I'd blow up all her Baby Feminist
beliefs, and in public, too.

Wait a second, I've already done that... 

>> and I omit to call you a man because it's a
>> title you haven't earned.

Feminists have AbZero basis to speak about men. So, no one
cares.

> It's not for waddling sea cows, like yourself, to define what a man is.

Exactly. But, note the self absorption of the Baby Feminist in it's
pathological belief that it can make such statements. Sad, innit ?

> The word has a definition based on age and physiology, not on the
> sexist expectations of bungling morons like yourself.

Agreed.

>> I said it on alt.feminism and I say it here. Males are weak.
>
> Then come get me, tough grrl.  Do you worst.

Better yet, lets offer her what we offered Parg: A free one way
trip to Saudi Arabia. Let her find out how " weak " the Patriarchy
can be... :-)

>> You haven't the balls to fight for your rights.
>
> Against whom?  Oh, you must mean female supremacists like yourself.
> Men are a bit too busy to acknowledge the bellowing mouths of you and
> your litter mates.

And, that men are doing it ( See F4J ) is what frosts her panties.

>> you bleat about
>> your rights as if you are so badly done to on a place where most
> agree with
>> you but they are weak males too and none have any power to do
>> anything so you achieve nothing at all.
>
> If we achieved nothing at all, that cute little chick car you zip
> around in would be a horse-drawn cart.

" If civilisation had been left in female hands, we would still be
living in grass huts. " Camille Paglia, " Sex, Art And American
Culture ", 1992, introduction.

>> You could enpower yourself to do something for
>> the rights of your gender
>
> Let me help you with this, ..... dear.  Men aren't interested in power.

Not for it's own sake, except for a few deviants. Same as with
women, and all Feminists.

> We're interested in  _freedom_.  Think we give a damn what
> you do?  Well we don't, unless you're riding us like talking monkeys on
> our backs, which you do because you can't support yourselves by
> yourselves.

Quite.

>> without petty squabbling and name calling then you
>> would be a man and you would earn the respect of women like me
>
> If you respected me, you might talk to me, and that is a fate I could
> not handle.  Please, continue not respecting me.  Go respect your
> fellow buzzcuts instead, Big Bird.

Lesbianism: The last refuge of the man hater.

> [...]

Andre


--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
                                    The Man Prayer, Red Green.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/25/05 8:46:00 PM ---