Hi, Dallas. :-)
Dallas Hinton - Wayne Harris writes:
> Hi, Wayne -- on Aug 04 2020 at 21:28, you wrote:
>
> >>
> >>> I don't think it optional but Nesfield disagrees:
> >>
> >> Speaking of punctuation, I missed a comma before `but'.
>
> WH> Is this comma always required? If so, who stated and where it is
> WH> stated?
>
> It's not always (or even often) required. "But" is a conjunction, not a
> conjuctive adverb and therefore the comma should or should not be there
> based on context (cf. Fowlers ).
I see! Interesting! I didn't know I'd find such great information
in there. Now I'm very happy. So, yes, I do need a book like that and
Fowler's does seem to be doing a great job. Thank you so very much.
So now I know that /but/ is an adversative conjunction. That's great.
It seems there is a classification of sentences among ``coordinating
sentences'' and ``subordinating sentences''. Is that correct?
Is there a rule such as coordinating clauses (in a coordinating
sentence) need not ever be separated by commas? That would imply, for
example, that you never need a comma before a but. But perhaps there's
no such rule.
I would believe that such rules would be spelled out on grammar books,
hence my asking about them in another thread.
Thank you!
--
I'm so obedient! I'm always after the rules! ;-)
---
* Origin: nntps://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
|