In a message of , Bob Seaborn (1:140/12.1) writes: 
 > I have not considered this issue.  The main goal of the sysop special is
 > to encourage BBSes to support ARJ.  I do not normally change
 > registration names unless we make a mistake.
 BS>       Speaking of which, is the registered/security envelope version of 
 BS> 2.50a
 BS> available yet?  I'm still waiting on mine.  You *did* say to be patient. 
 
 BS> :)
Hi,
Sorry for any misunderstanding.  A new version of ARJ-SECURE 2.41a was 
shipped to all ARJ-SECURE customers because the old ARJ-SECURE was no longer 
compatible.  With the release of 2.50a, there is no compatibility issue.  ARJ 
2.41a ARJ-SECURE will continue to secure properly.  Users may still request a 
new version of ARJS via the usual route (SASE with diskette or $5 for S & H).
However, if you did specifically order one, please refresh my memory on the 
circumstances and I will get right on it.  Sorry.
Best regards,
Robert
 
--- msged 2.07
---------------