Hello Jan!
You wrote me the following:
JD> You can still use high ASCII if you index on a function that replaces
JD> them
JD> with spaces, and not on the field directly. It becomes a little slower
JD> though. Better still: is there no *keyboard* character that you can use
JD> (which will never be used in the strings), like the vertical | bar? You
JD> can't ask your users to keep entering Alt-codes.
I know that I can index on such a function, but why should I make a slower
index when the files are so big? The users enter the data in, for instance, 5
get's and a function puts them in the right order and with the right
separators in one field. So the user doesn't have to struggle with the
Alt-codes. By the way, my purpose is that the user can always use every
character that's on his keyboard.
Greetings,
Joop Buker
--- FMail 1.02
---------------
* Origin: ICHTHUS-BBS, 1200 - 28800 - 0318-555956 (2:283/218.418)
|