From: "Frank Q" 
To: , 
Reply-To: "Frank Q" 


Hi All

I'm sure that Jim's program is a good product, and as you say, Jim did a
lot of good work, but, if someone wants to use an alternative method of
analysing results, then that someone should be free to use his/her choice
without fear of being reprimanded.

I write ALL my software for design & analysis on windows and I'm
currently starting to move it across to Linux. (The KDE environment will be
real interesting !!)
I wouldn't know what six-tests was if it jumped up and bit my nose (sorry Jim).

The other point worth making is that it is NOT the program that is
important but the results - and it doesn't matter what program generated
these results.
What is important is that the results should be able to be interpreted by anyone
and also (if necessary or appropriate) be in such a format that they can be used as
input for any other program.

Cheers
Frank Q



----- Original Message -----
From: 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:23 AM Subject: ATM Sixtests versus other
Foucault analysis programs: kindling wood


>
> OK,  I am going to risk getting flamed here.
>
> I have noticed a lot of atm's on this list using programs other than
Sixtests to
> analyze Foucault data.  (I am refering to manually obtained data, not any
> robotic methods.)
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4