TNP,
> In the few years that I worked in the same company as Richard, I never
> knew him to be *wrong* openly.
And it turns out he wasn't. But thats not the problem.
For some reason he just assumed that his description of what actually
happens should make sense to me, and when I indicated that it didn't he just
posted the same again (instead of trying something different). Which is
all sorts of things, but definitily /not/ helpfull.
Besides that, I think I was rather clear about what I thought would be
happening (starting with "As far as I can (now) tell, the "PWMType.tp_new =
PyType_GenericNew;" line creates a single instance" at 19/12/03), but
somehow that was not picked up on.
Just a simple "no instance is created" reply by Ahem brought me, after more
than a handfull of messages on the subject, back on the right track.
tl;dr:
if richard may demand from me that I "just understand" his explanation,
should I than not be allowed to demand he "just understands" my
problem/confusion ? Or is there some unwritten law somewhere which
forbids that ?
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | FidoUsenet Gateway (3:770/3)
|