On 17/12/2019 11:52, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 17/12/2019 10:29, R.Wieser wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>>> and refusing to engage with attempts to correct you.
>>
>> I thought that I've been engaging all this time, including posting
>> examples,
>> trying to get my point across ...
>>
>>> you keep stating strange theories
>>
>> ... which you seem to refuse to even to try to understand/figure out
>> what my
>> problem was, but just kept repeating the same line over-and-over.   Thats
>> not helpfull at all.
>>
>> And funny that, the person who refuses to engage me demands I should be
>> engaging him. Hypocritical much ?
>>
>>> Well, no, it doesn't mean that.
>>
>> I'm going to use your own approach here:
>>
>> That also means that explanation below it fully meaningless to me
>> (doesn't
>> have any soldid ground).
>>
>> There, I have said it twice.  It should be clear to you now.   Or do you
>> need the same line a third time ? /s
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rudy Wieser
>>
>>
> Be careful.
>
> In the few years that I worked in the same company as Richard, I never
> knew him to be *wrong* openly.
>
> In short, he didn't open his mouth until he was sure of his position.
>
>
I think Rudy was complaining Richard was unhelpful as opposed to wrong.

I have a little sympathy for that slant. The thread came across as
Richard, the professional coder, unwilling to adapt his answer to suit
the needs of an enthusiastic novice.

This is a Raspberry Pi group.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05