| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM Robo-Foucault, the `Fresh Start` is in progress! :) |
From: "James Lerch" To: "ATM List" Reply-To: "James Lerch" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vladimir Galogaza" > > >I've always had the intuitive suspicion that zone radii errors were > >Robo-Foucault's Achilles' heel. > > J. Burrows. > > Achilles' heel was fatal fault (for Achilles). Accuracy of the zone > determination is not fatal (for Robotest , in its JL incarnation). > It is influencing its accuracy. To what extent, we shall see soon. Yes, the extent of Robo's accuracy shall soon be publicly known, perhaps as soon as this time next week. As a quick reminder, Robo was written to specifically address the problems associated with testing optics during a weekend 4 hour ATM Class/Workshop. Robo had two specific requirements: #1 Maintain accuracy equal to or better than classic Couder mask, knife edge testing. #2 Substantially reduce test time. Requirement #2 has been meet without question, the other requirement is now in a 'interesting' state, as Couder and Robo strongly disagree (for this size and F/Ratio optic) > It seems that I forgot what has caused RoboFoucault investigation. > As far as I remember it was observation ( by Robo author) that results are > sensitive ( depending) on the source ( or image ) intensity. > But later this aspect was not mentioned any more nor resolved. Instead > efforts are concentrated on the comparison of the Robo results with > " absolute truth" that is to find out absolute accuracy ( and > repeatability) of > RoboFoucault test. > Initial intensity related problem is forgotten or under a carpet. Why is > that so? The solution was public discussed, starting with the post from Mike Peck (last paragraph): http://astro.umsystem.edu/atm/ARCHIVES/MAY03/msg00164.html Specifically, Mike's suggestion of implementing a Slit based source, eliminated the change in KE readings as a result of changing either the image source intensity, or the Shade of Gray used for evaluating nulls. I do not know why this should be so. BTW, slit vs. slitless appeared to agree with each other WHEN a bright image source and low shade of gray were used during the slitless Robo test. James Lerch --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/100 1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.