On 17/12/2019 10:29, R.Wieser wrote:
> Richard,
>
>> and refusing to engage with attempts to correct you.
>
> I thought that I've been engaging all this time, including posting examples,
> trying to get my point across ...
>
>> you keep stating strange theories
>
> ... which you seem to refuse to even to try to understand/figure out what my
> problem was, but just kept repeating the same line over-and-over.   Thats
> not helpfull at all.
>
> And funny that, the person who refuses to engage me demands I should be
> engaging him. Hypocritical much ?
>
>> Well, no, it doesn't mean that.
>
> I'm going to use your own approach here:
>
> That also means that explanation below it fully meaningless to me (doesn't
> have any soldid ground).
>
> There, I have said it twice.  It should be clear to you now.   Or do you
> need the same line a third time ? /s
>
> Regards,
> Rudy Wieser
>
>
Be careful.

In the few years that I worked in the same company as Richard, I never
knew him to be *wrong* openly.

In short, he didn't open his mouth until he was sure of his position.


--
     “I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the
greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most
obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of
conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which
they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by
thread, into the fabric of their lives.”

     ― Leo Tolstoy

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05