Hello mark!

14 Jun 03 19:55, mark lewis wrote to Mike Tripp:

 ml> while true, it only put a ceiling on the maximum message size able to
 ml> be processed... if the code had been written properly, it'd likely
 ml> still be able to be used today with larger limits... indeed, it may
 ml> even be that fidonet would have already been carrying encoded pictures
 ml> and such like internet email does... i remember several FTSC proposals
 ml> for new PKT types that used "containers" and allowed for just such
 ml> traffic...

Yep...that's exactly what I'm afraid of.  That's also why I only bump my
"Buffers" statement up to "Large" during newsgroup-only
processing runs.  The "too large" error in the logs helps
identify who needs to be added to SQTool's kill filter. ;)

Maybe it's time for Squish to get a keep-by-size parameter added to
keep-by-days and keep-by-qty. :)

.\\ike

--- GoldED/2 2.50+