>>  WD> Attempts to do that have happened twice over the past 5
 >>  WD> months. For starters by considering the vote of a ZC who
 >>  WD> does not even qualify as a basic sysop.
 >>
 >> define "basic sysop"...

 WD> The ability to accept PSTN crash-mail during listed


that right there is too much... the definition of "sysop" is very
simple... "SYStem OPerator"... nothing more... nothing less...
we've got system users in this network that qualify as sysops...

 WD> "open"-hours is a requirement for a ZC.
"Requirement" listed
 WD> where? Listed in the brain of any intellectually straight
 WD> person. Please do not even reply, I know what you're going
 WD> to write and I'm not interested.

oh you do? you know what i'm going to write? from whence did you get this
time machine that you can see in to the future and tell what my own mind
doesn't even know?

methinks you and others are, once again, reading too much into what you see
before you :(

)\/(ark