>> I presume if I want to know the specs for any
 >> of these POSIX functions, they will all be in my Borland C++
 >> 3.1 manual?

 dn> POSIX is a multi-layered standard, and covers pretty much everything from
 dn> design of low level system calls to filesystem structure and organisation
 dn> to reference manual formatting and user interfaces.

 dn> As to whether it is even mentioned in Borland's manual, I have no idea. I
 dn> guess this remark has something to do with your 'anti-Borland fan'
 dn> attitude, but I have no idea what you mean by it. It is entirely
 dn> irrelevent to my comment.

Nope.  What I meant was "is Borland C++ 3.1's implementation of the
POSIX functions compliant?".  Because if I can just have a list of all
POSIX functions (just their names), then I don't need the POSIX specs, I
can look them up in my manual!  BFN.

Paul

--- GoldED/2 2.42.G1114