TC>   You have no legal, moral, or ethical right to demand any such  
TC> information. 
TC>   You are obviously not LEO. 
TC>   A LEO respects privacy, due to law, and moral/ethic values. 
TC>   So do many other professions, not necessary related to law 
TC> enforcement.  I don't know he is a LEO or not, nor do I care. 
TC> I do care that you do NOT care. 
TC>   These people know, often first hand what damage can be done  
TC> with such information. 
I never said I was an LEO or anything related to it.  Charles has.  However, 
what he says and does doesn't match up, so many people including me ask for 
his credentials.  Sorry, I may not be an LEO, but I AM smart enough to know 
when someone's full of it and acting like an arrogant SOB, until recently 
(probably to rebut us more effeciently).  I know how inportant 
confidentiality is to a first responder, such as a police officer or a 
lifeguard.  However, I also know how important it is not to hide behind it, 
which Charles has effectively done.  What we need is an outside party to 
settle the disagreements between Charles, me, and some of the others that 
have like me discovered that he's probably full of it.  Unfortuantely, we 
have no place in cyberspace other than the internet we can do that, because I 
can't afford the long distance charges.
Peace.
--- CNet/3
---------------