Hey Nancy!

> I'd not expect to make too many dimensions of compatibility
> there, either

Personally I'd be happy knowing what a dimension of compatibility is and
then I may or not be happy knowing why I lack them.

> That would indeed be an interesting excursion.

Without knowing for sure, I believe it would be, especially the fireworks
part.  Ages ago a couple friends phoned me long distance from London so I
could hear the fireworks.  I think they may have enjoyed that more than I
but I did appreciate it at the time.

> I take it that Guy Fawkes Day isn't quite as celebrated in
> other parts of the Dominion...?

Definetly not this part of the Dominion.  I don't believe other parts do
either but I don't know for certain.

> brought out half a dozen or so, and set up a mini-tasting just
> for me at their house.

I am jealous.  You have much better single malt scotch stories than I.

> A couple of degrees of compatibility here, I'd say

Hm.  I never considered an angular component to compatibilty.  Also you
raise another paradox in that lack of dimension(s) of compatibilty might be
in itself a dimension of compatibilty.

Life is good,
Maurice

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag