RK> You could use this to write an alternate page for IE.
The thing is that it just seems to be on this one machie. Other IE 
machines don't seem to have the problem. Weird. That's a good 
suggestion, though. I'll look into the problem more deeply.
RK> Netscape and IE look at pages differently. Two different versions to
RK> cover Netscape and IE might be the only way.
It shouldn't be that way. Why bother having standards? Or a WWW at all? 
Maybe we should just go back to the '60's when no-one could read 
anything on the 'Net. [:/ Thanks again, Micro$oft!
RK> You might want to have a non-graphic version available.
Well, the whole idea of HTML standardization is that text-only browsers 
can read the graphical pages. If this turns out to be an IE problem then 
I may just leave it and let nature take its course.
Thanks. Take care and TTYL.
 ** Deep Space 9: To boldly stay where no one has stayed before.
--- PCBoard (R) v15.4/M 5 Beta
(1:244/506)
---------------