https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.comp.virus/K1Xt2X0Z8EA/IoQgj7v8K
4oJ
or
https://tinyurl.com/no9uvdo

Path:
g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!blackhelico
pter.databasix.com!not-for-mail
From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" 
Newsgroups:
alt.comp.virus,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.privacy.spyware,alt.os.
windows-xp
Subject: Re: Dustin Cook - inside the head of a woman abuser
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:56:34 -0400
Organization: DataBasix - Continuing to kick USENet ass.
Lines: 84
Message-ID: 
References:   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


X-Trace: blackhelicopter.databasix.com 1158624012 29543
blackhelicopter.databasix.com (19 Sep 2006 00:00:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: ab...@databasix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:00:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Xref: g2news2.google.com alt.comp.virus:10706 alt.usenet.kooks:239243
alt.comp.anti-virus:14245 alt.privacy.spyware:14244 alt.os.windows-xp:31628

Dustin Cook wrote:
> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>
>> You stated that you believed I intended to post or share your emails.
>
> What I stated was and still state is that your a usenet wh0re; It
> really had nothing to do with the emails. You thought I quit talking
> to you over that, but.. I didn't. The emails don't contain enough
> details to do me any real harm. Yes, you have some background on my
> family life, and you know a little about what I do for a living, which
> surprises me as you make no effort to correct your pissant friends
> when they posted the diagostic? report they think I fit.

I think you have a personality disorder, so there's no reason for me to
correct anything.

The only real question is whether you're a danger to yourself, because
you are a documented danger to others.

> I've learned that's how you are tho. I'm sure you'll come back with a
> one or two line response to this post as well, based on your previous
> acts. It seems anytime I strike a good debate point, your quick to
> back off. :)

What debate point?

>> So you posted my address and telephone number anyway.
>
> I posted a signature you provided in your emails, yes. You emailed it
> to me; remember?
> A virtual business card I do believe was the intention of that
> signature. What else would explain the need to include a google map
> AND a fax number?

Dustin, it was not a virtual business card, whatever the #### that is.
It was one of several sigs provided by Plaxo. I didn't give it a whole
lot of thought when I used it, and I never paid much attention to the
links it contained, of which there were apparently two.

The fact remains that you posted my real life information without my
permission and you violated my privacy. And then you posted it to
alt.sex, with an invitation to all and sundry to stop by, thereby
endangering not just my safety but that of my family.

>> And I still haven't posted or shared your emails.
>
> So the claim you made of providing them to the police was what then?

Ah...I see...no Dustin, giving your emails and your posts to law
enforcement isn't the same thing as "posting or sharing" your emails,
IMO.

You have put my family in danger with the alt.sex post. That takes it to
another level entirely.

Trying to spin it differently is only spin.

> Hot air? More bull####? :) My lawyer is still waiting for initial
> contact, and since I'm being billed for his time, I do expect it
> relatively soon. We'd like to get this matter into a court room as
> soon as possible. I'd like to collect legal fees as soon as possible
> as well. :) Be in touch yes?

Dustin, if any action is taken against you, it will be because a law
enforcement agency deems it to be warranted based on it's own
investigation of the facts, which is essentially the reading of posts
and emails in chronological order. No more, no less. You won't be
collecting anything from me, because at most, I am a witness. The case
will not bey styled Kirk v. Cook but US v. Cook.

As I said, you can sue the FBI.

> Like I said in a previous post today, you have more twists and turns
> than some of the old roads we have here.



-- 
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Ph?dre n? Delaunay

--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2