G'day david.



10 Mar 94 06:50, david nugent wrote to Tommy Kolega:



 dn> I'll remain skeptical about this until I see something with my own eyes

 dn> which actually does what it advertises. So far I haven't.



I've often wondered why it would be difficult to produce a compiler and
library specific disassembler that encapsulated the standard library calls
and just got down to the basics :).  For instance, the disassembler could
recognise Borland's large model startup code, and each of the library
functions, and reduce the output to 'user-written' code only.



In fact, you could probably 'train' your system by providing a dummy
program with calls to every std library routine, which the end user
compiles with the compiler for which per wants to produce a 'signature'. 
Hmmmm.



If you're not busy this week, would you mind writing one for me? 



Cheers,

Greg   |;^)



--- GoldED 2.40.P0720