-={ Sunday, 24 April 2016, 09:21:14.953491430 +1000 }=-

Hey Tony!

 TL> those using standard QWK won't have that.

I see that.  Not really an issue but my first thought was I could have used it
to compare messages/replies originating here to compare the subject line.  Oh
well.

 TL> I can't fathom why they thought 25 characters was enough for a
 TL> subject line

Yeah.  I am guessing bad drugs.  I notice you decided to drop the "Re: " part
not that it matters anymore.  I am still thinking about a suitable fix and at
this point in time cannot come up with one that addresses the old QWK
limitations.

 TL> finding suitable doors is the hard part

Right.  That was my observation way back when it mattered.  That is why I
started playing around with ideas back then.

 TL> Notfamiliar with WeBeBashing.

You're looking at it as we speak.  Although it wasn't called anything way back
when, it is what I am using to reply to you and did evolve from the early
playing around with bash scripting.  Seeing I am the only one it never needed
to go beyond and become c source.

Life is good,
Maurice

... Don't cry for me I have vi.
--- GNU bash, version 4.4.0(1)-rc1 (x86_64-atom-linux-gnu)