| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Auslinx Tasmanian Devil 3 |
Alex, at 14:52 on Dec 14 1996, you wrote to Bill Grimsley... BG> Rockwell's 56k will not be compatible with x2. AM> Why wouldn't it be compatible? Because USR have frequently said so themselves! AM> The current USR modems are all compatible with the Rockwell standard, But only insofar as Rockwell's V.FC being supported by the Courier. Even Rockwell's Class 2 fax isn't currently supported by USR. AM> the Rockwell 56K wouldn't be called x2 obviously, but it should be AM> compatible, otherwise people are either going to choose one or another. Rockwell and Lucent (sp?) Technologies will apparently be offering 56k protocols which are purportedly 100% compatible with each other, but (as usual), USR have rather stupidly decided to go it alone with x2, which is compatible with absolutely nothing else whatsoever. AM> Incompatibility between the two when they become more AM> widespread would be a real inconvenience to everybody. You'd think that both Rockwell and USR might have learned their lessons from the V.FC, HST, and Class 2 debacles, but that isn't the case at all. Regards, Bill --- MsgedSQ/2 3.50* Origin: Logan City, SEQ (3:640/305.9) SEEN-BY: 50/99 620/243 623/630 640/201 206 230 305 306 311 702 820 821 822 SEEN-BY: 640/823 829 711/401 410 413 430 808 809 899 932 934 712/311 407 505 SEEN-BY: 712/506 515 517 624 628 704 824 841 888 713/317 714/906 772/20 800/1 @PATH: 640/305 820 712/624 515 711/808 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.