Hey mark!
ml> you already used iconv to validate that they are aliases of
ml> ISO-8859-1...
The opposite is true. I used iconv to show that the aren't aliases of
ISO-8859-1.
echo -e "A Møøse once bit my sister..." | iconv -f utf8 -t latin-1
produces the following error;
iconv: conversion to `latin-1' is not supported
Try `iconv --help' or `iconv --usage' for more information.
Whereas a valid alias such as latin1 produces the proper conversion which are
the ISO-8859-1 codes for the slashed o's and ASCII chararcters for everything
else. Also the acceptable aliases for ISO-8859-1 are as follows;
grep 'ISO-8859-1//' /usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules | grep '^alias'
alias ISO-IR-100// ISO-8859-1//
alias ISO_8859-1:1987// ISO-8859-1//
alias ISO_8859-1// ISO-8859-1//
alias ISO8859-1// ISO-8859-1//
alias ISO88591// ISO-8859-1//
alias LATIN1// ISO-8859-1//
alias L1// ISO-8859-1//
alias IBM819// ISO-8859-1//
alias CP819// ISO-8859-1//
alias CSISOLATIN1// ISO-8859-1//
alias 8859_1// ISO-8859-1//
alias OSF00010001// ISO-8859-1//
All the above are easily confirmed by searching the appropriate online
documentation. I suggest IANA but there are many others who post the
legitimate aliases for registered character sets/encodings.
As shown above there is NO such aliases as LATIN-1 or latin-1 and especially
not "Latin 1" or "latin 1". The facts simply do not support such a claim no
matter what you believe.
ml> i believe you are just being pedantic and playing ignorant :shrug:
Again you have no evidence to support your beliefs. I have bent over backwards
providing suitable and verifiable evidence to support the above listed aliases
as legitimate aliases for ISO-8859-1. I cannot and will not falsely claim that
LATIN-1 or any form of it other than LATIN1 (latin1) as a useable alias for any
software deployed bu this fine and upstanding Fidonet node.
Life is good,
Maurice
... Don't cry for me I have vi.
--- GNU bash, version 4.4.0(1)-rc1 (x86_64-atom-linux-gnu)
* Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001.0)
|