>Andre Lieven
>Hint: You get to define your parameters. Period.

- No you don't define the parameters, you live under one legal system
or you don't speaking of the "law" when there are many different
readers from many different legal systems fails to have meaning.

> Equality is legal term which applies to a specific legal system.
>>Thats one definition, yes. Its NOT the only one.

-Nope, it is the only one.

> So
> this just begs the question, which legal system are you talking
about?

Ibid.
-See above

> French napolionic code? Sudanese reading of the Sharia? or are you
> being philosophical and speaking of Rousseau or John Locke?

> As you have noted in another thread this is a world wide usenet, so
> your statement above has absolutely no meaning because it lacks
context
> and a frame of reference.

No proof offered ? Claim fails.
- Reread the the above sentence and try to figure out if I was making a
claim or asking a question.  Bright one this guy is.

Thanks for that, now we regulars here know what weight to give your
claims: AbZero.

- God forbid someone wouldn't have "the regulars" respect! How is this
an insult?



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/26/05 8:46:23 PM ---