Michael Snyder wrote:
> "kate"  wrote in message
> news:1111798840.355681.211970{at}g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Michael Snyder wrote:
>
> > > Young men take part in more risk-taking behavior, and this of
course
> > > results in a certain number of casualties.  To use this as an
> > argument
> > > that boys don't deserve any sympathy is pathetic, though,
especially
> > > in light of the fact tha the original subject was scholastic
> > achievement
> > > and disadvantage.
> >
> > Show me where I said they don't deserve sympathy - or that we don't
> > have a boy crisis! I am saying that the statistics sited carry with
> > them implications that have nothing to do with the so-called
"gender
> > war".
>
> Well, and what if they do?  The color of grass has implications
> that have nothing to do with photosynthesis, but that doesn't prove
> that grass isn't a plant.

That was truly evasive.

> > As for instigating men to commit acts of violence - I see no
> > statistical evidence that women generally do this.
>
> And here is a perfect example of you pulling a tangent to
> change the subject.  I certainly said *nothing* about women
> "instigating" men to commit violence -- you pulled that
> straight from your ass.

No, not at all. One of your troll-brothers calling himself "Society"
asserted that very thing in this very thread. And since I see very
little difference between him and you, being fellow travelors in the
soc.men rat warren, I threw that into the mix.

What you cannot seem to embrace is the fact that young men are quite
often responsible for their own early demise and that woman aren't to
blame for their deaths. Nor can you fix the problem until you stop with
this stupid blame game and seriously examine its causes.

Kate



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/26/05 8:46:24 PM ---