Dustin  wrote in
news:XnsA3E98AAE38DCC9X238BHEUFHHI5RJ791@192.254.233.145: 

> Jax  wrote in 
> news:XnsA3E9958F1F994JAX@127.0.0.1:
> 
>> Mike Duffy  wrote in
>> news:m4e93f$oeu$1@dont-email.me: 
>> 
>>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 01:39:16 +0000 (UTC), Dustin wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I suspect that's exactly how things will go down in the event
>>>> both of us are able to create the md5 hash (oh, my bad, your
>>>> checksum) 
>>> 
>>> Sadly, I agree. And thanks for pointing out that there is a
>>> difference between "hash" and "checksum". I always thought that
>>> the two terms were synonymous and needed to look up the (subtle)
>>> difference. Although, as you say, the MD5 algorithm serves as
>>> both in my case, this is more because of the manner I want to
>>> use it than the nature of the algorithm itself. 
>> 
>> Mike that was an interesting reply you got from Dustin. Your plan
>> has too many holes for me to be interested. Dustin too it seems. 
> 
> Oh, I have no real issue with his plan. I just don't think we can 
> both do it. :)
>  
>> I don't know much about MD5...... and nor do you the difference
>> between us is I know my limits and that's why I don't talk about
>> MD5. Maybe you should do the same. Just saying!
> 
> You don't know anything about ASIC, exevalid, c++, assembler, 
> hardware (most IT related things) and yet, none of this has
> stopped you from commenting before. Why now?

Dustin I know about some things, people tell me other things.... but
I don't know everything. Just saying! 

-- 
Jax        
--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2