| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Conversion up or down |
In a message on Tuesday 09-05-16 Tony Langdon said to Holger Granholm: Hi Tony, HG> So, finally it all depends upon from which viewpoint you look at it. TL> No, it's simple. If the output frequency is lower than the input TL> (e.g. 1296 MHz in, 28 MHz out), then it's a downconverter. If the TL> output frequency is higher than the input frequency (e.g. 136 kHz to TL> 3.5 MHz), then it's an upconverter. Still simpler it is to leave out the up- or down-, and just name it a converter. TL> That rule works whether you're transmitting or receiving. In the case of conversion to from a frequency, a transverter does both. My Tokyo Hy-Power VHF-HF transverter does both. It converts a HF amateur band to 144 MHz when receiving, and a 144 MHz transmitting signal to a HF amateur band, 3.5, 7, 14, 21 or 28 MHz on transmit. Have a nice day, Holger ___ * MR/2 2.30 * Some call me the gangster of love. --- PCBoard (R) v15.22 (OS/2) 2* Origin: Coming to you from the Sunny Aland Islands. (2:20/228) SEEN-BY: 203/0 633/0 267 280 281 410 412 640/384 1384 712/620 848 770/1 @PATH: 20/228 201/111 0 203/0 640/384 712/848 633/280 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.