| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Digital vs Analog |
"Richard Webb -> Earl Croasmun" wrote in
news:31028$POL_INC{at}JamNNTPd:
~>> Not so. The "rabbit ears" won't work very well because
they are a
RW> form of ~> simple dipole antenna designed for VHF frequencies. However
RW> the "bullseye" ~> antenna or the wire circle antenna
supplied with
RW> many NTSC tuner TV sets ~> will receive the now mandated ATSC
RW> (digital) signals just fine.
EC>> True, if they have one, but the stumbling block is the tuner. Any
EC>> antenna attached to an analog tuner will not get digital. The
EC>> original switch-over to digital broadcasts was supposed to come
RW> when EC> most consumers HAD digital-ready sets. It kept getting
RW> pushed off, EC> because people weren't buying them. The rebate for
RW> add-on EC> converters was supposed to take care of that, but I have
RW> never seen EC> any research on the effectiveness of that idea.
RW> Most I know either have the converters, or digital ready
RW> sets, or don't give a rip about a tv.
Out of all my relatives, only one has a digital antenna.
The rest have satellite or cable.
Her antenna looks much like a analog antenna.
http://tinyurl.com/29th7xc
--- Xnews/5.04.25
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 640/954 712/0 313 848 @PATH: 123/789 500 261/38 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.