TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: pol_inc
to: Richard Webb
from: Ross Sauer
date: 2010-06-25 07:19:50
subject: Digital vs Analog

"Richard Webb -> Earl Croasmun"  wrote in
news:31028$POL_INC{at}JamNNTPd:

 ~>> Not so. The "rabbit ears" won't work very well because
they are a
 RW> form of ~> simple dipole antenna designed for VHF frequencies. However
 RW> the "bullseye" ~> antenna or the wire circle antenna
supplied with
 RW> many NTSC tuner TV sets ~> will receive the now mandated ATSC
 RW> (digital) signals just fine.

 EC>> True, if they have one, but the stumbling block is the tuner.  Any
 EC>> antenna attached to an analog tuner will not get digital.  The
 EC>> original switch-over to digital broadcasts was supposed to come
 RW> when EC> most consumers HAD digital-ready sets.  It kept getting
 RW> pushed off, EC> because people weren't buying them.  The rebate for
 RW> add-on EC> converters was supposed to take care of that, but I have
 RW> never seen EC> any research on the effectiveness of that idea.

 RW> Most I know either have the converters, or digital ready
 RW> sets, or don't give a rip about a tv.

Out of all my relatives, only one has a digital antenna.
The rest have satellite or cable.

Her antenna looks much like a analog antenna.

http://tinyurl.com/29th7xc

--- Xnews/5.04.25
* Origin: Fidonet Via Newsreader - http://www.easternstar.info (1:123/789.0)
SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 640/954 712/0 313 848
@PATH: 123/789 500 261/38 712/848 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.