Hello Bob!

15 Jun 10 16:02, you wrote to me:

 BK>  You may well be wrong.

 BK>  If I went deeply into my beliefs on these subjects you might
 BK>  well be even more infuriated. As a small sample, I really do
 BK>  believe Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Feith and the rest of the
 BK>  Cabal that got us into Iraq should stand trial on 4000 counts of
 BK>  murder in the death of the US military who died there. Then turn
 BK>  them over to our allies who had people who died there.

 BK>  They really should.

Well, I believe that all liberal democrats, should be rounded up, sent to
an isolated pacific atoll and have a couple nukes dropped onto them.. hmmm.

 RC>> You will disagree with my assessment of the method of
 RC>> communication being the poorest venue, because disagreeing
 RC>> with everyone is what you do best.. ;-) (again an observed
 RC>> perception in this particular venue)

 BK>  I am not even sure of what you are saying. Nor do I see the
 BK>  point of the method of communication on this issue.

Then you should sue the education system that spewed you into the world,
they forgot to endow you with the ability to comprehend.

Unlike in person communications where one can decipher tone of voice,
facial expressions and body language, or at minimum via voice communication
where tone of voice can be interpreted, the written forum is absent all of
that.

 RC>> What you deem as most desirable is that everything be as
 RC>> portrayed in Mister Roger's neighborhood and that everyone
 RC>> vote hyphen-d.

 BK>  Which is so obviously unrelated to the point in question as to
 BK>  be an obvious diversion and distraction. You do that a lot.

So you say, perhaps you just want to be obstinant?

 RC>> He would not have *ever* received the grief he has, as
 RC>> pertaining to the buttons he provided.

 BK>  That has zero effect on the fact that *YOU* consider revealing
 BK>  that information as providing a weapon. I know enough about you
 BK>  to do much the same to you.

Whatever info I have provided have not gone into the realm of intimate
details, nor have those details been embellished.

 RC>>>> Sauer did.

 BK>>>  Mine is on my website. Not linked, but there.

 RC>> Whatever for?

 BK>  So, if I chose, I can give the URL to someone to prove I did
 BK>  serve.

Why, I believe you when you say you served when/where/how you served.

Then again, I never have seen you embellish your service.

The problem here is Sauer let himself be goaded into sending a reproduction
of his DD214 to someone he had been sparring with and then much later on,
in a message conversation to someone decided to fluff up his military
experience that went way beyond what is supported by his DD214. One of my
bosses was a weapons mechanic in the USAF, for the F16, he said that 65
days in the USAF, 42 being basic training, would not have come close to
meeting the boasts Sauer had made. Another story, relating on how funny he
thought a F15 crash was, only speaks volumes to his character.

I was in the very echo when he made his weapons mechanic claims and saw the
message, WHAT'S_HOT! and he was making the boast to Raymond Yates, Jack
Yates brother. At the time I read the message, I did not know Sauers
incomplete USAF career history. Both were talking about the A10 Warthog,
facts the two were discussing and correcting each other on were the color
paint used, calibre and make up of the ammo used in the primary weapon.
Raymond served in the US Army and worked in military intelligence in the
Pentagon.

What Sauer should have done was say piss on those whom dont believe he
served, without the DD214 he so readily produced, he could have made
himself out to be anything and there would have been far less to refute it.

==
Ross
Fidonet Feeds Or Fidonet In Your Newsreader: http://www.easternstar.info
E-mail: ross(at)cassell(dot)us | Other Places: http://links.cassell.us
Things To Remember:

The government can't give to anybody anything that the government does
not first take from somebody else.

Those whom do not stand for something, will stand for anything.
... Racist: Anyone who disagree's with Obama.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20060121