Hello Wes!

29 Jun 03 10:55, you wrote to me:

 BS>> Yes, but as programmer you ignore warnings :) They
 BS>> should be gone in sometime.

 WG> No, no, no! As a programmer, you pay careful attention to all
 WG> warnings, and do whatever you can to eliminate them.

Okey, Okey :)

 WG> Unfortunately, on a project of this magnitude, that can be a lot of
 WG> work. The C++ code needs to be modified to compile warning-free
 WG> without -traditional or -fpermissive. The pragma warnings are easy --

Yeah.

 WG> Old:
 WG> #pragma off(unreferenced)
 WG> static char rcs_id[]="$Id: dos.c,v 1.1.1.1 2002/10/01 17:50:52 sdudley
 WG> Exp $"; #pragma on(unreferenced)

 WG> New:
 WG> #ifndef __GNUC__
 WG> #pragma off(unreferenced)
 WG> #endif
 WG> static char __attribute__((unused)) rcs_id[]="$Id: asyncnt.c,v 1.2
 WG> 2003/06/04 2$ #ifndef __GNUC__ #pragma on(unreferenced) #endif

 WG> It's wordy, but should be portable to all previously-supported
 WG> platforms, plus gcc. Oh, under non-gcc, we need to add

Yeah, that's quite easy.

Regards,
Bo

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5