-> ~>  ~> Note to Hulet, Richardson, Croasmun and the rest of the "not
-> ~>  ~> invented here" bunch

-> ~>  EC> Can you give some clue as to what you are trying to say?

Still nothing from you.

-> ~> You try to present yourself as a bright spark

-> EC> I post comments in fidonet.  If you take them as comments from a
-> EC> "bright spark," that is your subjective reaction.  But it has
-> EC> nothing do do with the question.  Looks like you once again not
-> EC> knowing what YOU are saying.

-> I didn't say that, earl. I said "You try to present yourself

And once again your OWN WORDS have to be explained to you!  What I
was IF you take them that way, it is because of YOUR REACTION to my
comments, not because of anything related to my intent!  I say what I
choose to say, without caring for a second about "presentation" or your
reaction.  You made the juvenile error of confusing your reaction with
my intent.  If you take them as "bright," own up to it.  Don't try to
play psychic.

So far your main activities have been to (a) take posts about subjects
and respond to them with posts about posters, and (b) sidetrack threads
into discussions of semantics and syntax.  Is that the best you can do?

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10