-=> Earl Croasmun wrote to Dave Drum <=-


 -> ~>  EC> Can you give some clue as to what you are trying to say?

 EC> Still nothing from you.

 -> ~> You try to present yourself as a bright spark

 -> EC> I post comments in fidonet.  If you take them as comments from a
 -> EC> "bright spark," that is your subjective reaction.  But it has
 -> EC> nothing do do with the question.  Looks like you once again not
 -> EC> knowing what YOU are saying.

 -> I didn't say that, earl. I said "You try to present yourself

 EC> And once again your OWN WORDS have to be explained to you!  What I
 EC> was IF you take them that way, it is because of YOUR REACTION to my
 EC> comments, not because of anything related to my intent!  I say what I
 EC> choose to say, without caring for a second about
"presentation" or your
 EC> reaction.  You made the juvenile error of confusing your reaction with
 EC> my intent.  If you take them as "bright," own up to it. 
Don't try to
 EC> play psychic.

I didn't say that, earl. I said "You try to present yourself as a
bright spark"                        ^^^ ^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^

Not a word, nor a hint, that I consider you a bright spark. You, as is
common with you, have picked up the mooky end of the stick. Again.

I *know* what I am saying, and what I am implying. It is you who are
comprehension deficient.
 
 EC> So far your main activities have been to (a) take posts about subjects
 EC> and respond to them with posts about posters, and (b) sidetrack threads
 EC> into discussions of semantics and syntax.  Is that the best you can do?

I barely care about your alleged "analysis" of my activity. Fiddle-dee-dee.

ENJOY!!!

From Uncle Dirty Dave's Kitchen
Home of YAHOOOOAHHHH Hot Sauce & Hardin Cider 

 

... He's an experienced, ambitious and often quite picturesque liar-Mark Twain
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32