...

 WC>>>> Too obvious.
 WC>>>> Everyone is looking for the complex and complicated but the
 WC>>>> template for the solution exists in a garage mechanics lift.

 WC>>>> Lets see ANYONE shoot holes into this!

 DD>>> Even if they can't they will attack you personally, you old lefty
 DD>>> criminal biker dude, you. Bv)=

 RC>> Too bad no one from BP will read his suggestion.

 EH> I've been enjoying these guys talk like they're more
 EH> informed than the engineers trying to stop the leak. As if
 EH> the engineers are ignorant of hydraulics (hint: that's what
 EH> they are using WRT to pumping drilling mud and concrete
 EH> down into the well).

 I have been enjoying you guys talking about those guys talking
 as if you actually had something to say. All you can do is
 criticize them for thinking they might have an idea the
 engineers who have failed consistently might not have thought
 of. If those engineers knew how to stop it they would have.

 What is really incredibly amusing is you attack them, buy you
 failed completely to expound on the elementary physics that
 makes Wayne's idea doomed to fail. If you knew the physics
 involved you would have done so.

 I have been busy so I couldn't post on this sooner, and I
 decided to download another packet to see if any of you caught
 the error in the few days you have had to consider it.

 You haven't, you have been too busy with personal attacks to
 recognize your deficiency in science and research the question.

 I'll give you a little more time, to see if you get it. But not
 much.

 EH> Now, watch them come back with "so. what's your
 EH> suggestion?" as if BP needs suggestions from people who
 EH> have no earthly clue about dealing with a spewing oil well
 EH> a mile under the surface of the Golf of Mexico.

 It appears, neither does BP. With good reason, you do know what
 that reason is, don't you?

 BTW, Haliburton claims they did improper work because they were
 following orders from BP. For which Haliburton should be
 prosecuted. You do know why that is, don't you?

 EH> What they
 EH> can't square with that is the fact that shortly before the
 EH> well exploded, Obama's administration gave that well an
 EH> award for safely.



 They did? Your link doesn't show that. Your link (below) shows
 an award for safety, given in May 2009, for the year 2008. When
 did the well explode again?

 What's worse, you apparently didn't even follow the link in your
 cited article that lead to the Transocean magazine website that
 gives more information.

 Gee, I'd like to look it up, but the website for Transocean's
 magazine's website, beaconmag.com, has three quartely issues
 from 2009 in their website archive, and shows the Winter 2010
 issue on the homepage, but nothing in between. Do you think they
 were too busy to publish the missing 4 issues?

 ...

 ml>> where is this award mentioned? i've not seen anything about it... since
 ml>> when does some presidential administration give awards for corporate
 ml>> operations or some part of a corporation's operations? don't they have
 ml>> better things to do... like run the country??

 EH> It was given by the interior department, namely the MMS
 EH> whose head resigned just a few short hours before BHO gave
 EH> his long overdue press conference.

 EH> It shouldn't be hard for you to do a Google search of your
 EH> own to verify that the award was given.

 ...

 ml>> bullshit, ed... they are taking suggestions from all points... whether
 ml>> or not they consider or use them is another matter altogether...

 EH> Apparently you are another who likes to argue for the sake
 EH> of argument.

 You say that as if it were a bad thing.

 ...

 EH>>> It shouldn't be hard for you to do a Google search of your own to
 EH>>> verify that the award was given.

 ml>> i wouldn't have asked if i hadn't done the searches... since i did and
 ml>> found nothing, perhaps you'd care to actually post a URL to the mention
 ml>> of said award??

 EH> http://bit.ly/azgmqA

 Anyone who uses bit.ly loses credibility right from the start.

 ...

 EH>>> Uh... in BHO's case, he's not "run[ning] the country,
he's golfing,
 EH>>> taking vacations, refusing to comment or answer hard questions from
 EH>>> the press and trying to bribe Congressmen to drop out of primary
 EH>>> races.

 Well, since Bush took something like 1/4 of his term on his
 ranch or other vacation sites, it's a bit of a reach to claim
 Obama's golf time stops him from running the country.

 As to hard questions from the press, he's probably waiting for
 an intelligent question from the right wing media.

 The third point you posted there proved to be false, and seems
 to border on libel.

 ml>> gee... ya think? sounds much like your hero(s)... if they can do it, why
 ml>> not others?? double standards??

 EH> My heroes? Who would that be?

 Yes, we know you are your ideal.

 EH> You just above claimed BHO was too busy running the country
 EH> to give awards for safety to an oil rig. Now you are saying
 EH> "they all do it" when I point out he's out playing golf
 EH> rather than running the country.

 EH> Which is it?

 Both.

 He's never supposed to relax?

 Once more you are proven a failure.


BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a