EC>>> Those ARE your words!  More fully:

 EC>>> "My father is Otto David Sauer.
 EC>>> I'm Otto Ross Sauer."

 RS>> So?

 RC> You are the one whom bitches about people calling you Otto,
 RC> yet it was you whom revealed it.

 So what?

 EC>>> To complicate things further, you posted a document that claims
 EC>>> to show that "Otto Ross Sauer, Jr" was in the Air
Force briefly.
 EC>>> But then you later denied that there was any such person!  Was
 EC>>> that a fraudulent document?  Did you mention that to DD before
 EC>>> the backslapping began?

 RS>> I was instructed I had to sign that way.

 RC> Could it be that it is your full legal name and such a
 RC> document requires such?

 That is a military signature. You can legally use any name you
 want as long as fraud is not intended, but the military requires
 a specific signature.

 RS>> Now why are you and the rest of your anal retentive playground
 RS>> delinquents still harping on a dead issue?

 RC> Why on earth did you provide the info?

 Why do you think providing information is the same as providing
 a weapon? That is toxic thinking. It reveals more about the
 speaker than the object of the speech.

BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... It would be so nice to find an honest conservative to debate in Fidonet.
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a