"Ed Hulett -> Ross Sauer"  wrote in
news:30896$POL_INC{at}JamNNTPd:

 ~>>>>>> So he says to the world he approved of torture
and would do
 EH>   it EC>>>> again...

 EC>>>>> No, he didn't.

 EH>>> Someone else's words snipped...

 RS>>>> http://tinyurl.com/36688pw

 EH>>> If you think BHO the One has turned away from enhanced
 EH>   interrogations, EH>> you are being mislead by his propaganda
 EH>   machine. Just like he hasn't EH>> closed Gitmo, he hasn't stopped
 EH>   EI.

 RS>> I haven't seen any evidence the torture has continued, (and that
 EH>   is what RS> your bureaucratese-named "enhanced
interrogation" is,)
 EH>   however, if it is, RS> I'd like to know why, and by who.
 EH>   SPECIFICALLY.

 EH> It isn't MY name for it, it is the government's name for it. Why else
 EH> do you think BHO hasn't tried to bring charges against Bush and
 EH> Cheney?

Yet you still use the bureaucratese "enhanced interrogation."
That's like using an "impact-installed fastener." A nail.

"Enhanced interrogation" is torture.

 EH> It isn't because he loves them. It's because, like his silly promise
 EH> to close Gitmo, heck, all his promises, he hasn't stopped "enhanced
 EH> interrogation" either.

I still don't see any evidence torture has continued.

 EH> It's all about power and BHO is all for power. Progressives usually
 EH> are. And before you start whining about my progressives comment, Bush
 EH> was/is also a progressive. Social spending expanded during his 8
 EH> years, the idiot class whining to the contrary notwithstanding.

I have no idea what planet you live on. Nazis are "far-left" and George
Bush was "progressive." (Liberal, in other words.) :eyeroll:

--- Xnews/5.04.25