| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Most Unsecure OS? Yep, It`s Linux |
From: "Joe Barr"
To a shit eating mother fucking lying worm like you, Shupak?
Why bother. Everyone knows you have never under any conditions ever been
restrained by the truth.
You are the most famous liar on the face of the planet, Shupak.
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:33:03 +0000, wrote:
> More FUD and lies Mike. Why not make even a token attempt to support
> your false claims?
>
> Rich
>
> "Mike '/m'" wrote in message
> news:s10buu0oib9f4s4skooiur55le8nd53pmb{at}4ax.com... On Wed, 27 Nov 2002
> 20:50:16 -0500, "Geo." wrote:
>
> >Back in the NT 3.51 days, NT was by far more secure than any version of
> >Unix. The reason was because it wasn't mainstream and because it's
> >users/admins knew how to configure it.
>
> More than that.
>
> The GDI was not running at ring 0. Microsoft was more concerned about
> the NT's "proper architecture" than it was about performance and
> features. etc. etc.
>
> Now with the XP eye-candy, securiy has been thrown to the wolves of the
> like of RIAA. Mr. Cutler is probably turning over in his [virtual]
> grave....
>
> /m
>
>
>
>
>
> More FUD
and lies Mike.
> Why not make even a token attempt to support your false
> claims?
> Rich
size=2> * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)SEEN-BY: 3/2 10 106/1 120/544 123/500 379/1 633/260 267 270 285 774/0 605 SEEN-BY: 2432/200 7105/1 @PATH: 379/1 106/1 123/500 774/605 633/260 285 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.