| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Suggestions for Maximus |
Hello Bob. 01 Jul 03 15:48, you wrote to me: RT>> Run Maximus as user maximus, and belonging to group RT>> squish, reason being that RT>> other Fido programs already use fido, bbs. ftn as users RT>> and groups, and thus RT>> cause conflicts. Maximus and squish, are not likely to RT>> be used by any other RT>> fidonet software, now and/or in future. BJ> As to user and group stuff, Max/Squish isn't forced to any particular BJ> user name / group name at the moment. I do have a problem with BinkD BJ> running under user ftn and squish running under user maximus, both BJ> under group ftn, on my Debian 3.0r1 (Woody) based system. Squish BJ> places files in the outbound area in the current setup with a umask of BJ> 600 instead of 660, which then hangs BinkD from being able to properly BJ> send outbound files. Reception by BinkD and processing by Squish is BJ> working. So, I need to change the umask for squish to 660, probably BJ> by burring how squish is run under a shell script..... Or finding a BJ> rc file that is currently setting the umask to 600 and change that to BJ> 660 for the account squish is running under.... Right, now, I want it to work without my having to modify, too many items, ie. I don't want to deviate from the standard install, until, I have it working, and know how it functions, then it makes life easier when I do something, and it breaks, if you understand what I am getting at, .... RT>> Then again, not many people are going to try running RT>> Maximus and MBSE BBS on RT>> the same system. BJ> Only a few of us, but as software developers, we're more likely to try BJ> both out..... Hmmm ...., and when I break something I keep on breaking it, until it works or I give up, which in this case could have less than desirable effects on my MBSE BBS system. :-(( RT>> In my case, it is problematic running MBSE BBS and Maximus on the RT>> same system, even if one stops MBSE, and then runs Maximus, with RT>> MBSE user bbs, is the username that a new user is instructed to RT>> use, when he dials into a MBSE BBS for the first time. User bbs, RT>> does not have a password, and takes one imeidiately to the new RT>> user login/registration screen. BJ> Thats just a matter of configureing different accounts for running BJ> different things. This gets back to how you set the accounts up (i.e. BJ> the install scripts) rather than the programs themselves..... So far, BJ> everything above can be tweaked via how one creates users and groups, BJ> and how /etc/passwed works, etc. Yes, and is not a problem, if I understand what is going on, and everthing works, which it currently is/does not, and if I make changes, before I have it working, I have no idea, where the problem is and where "I" broke it, if it works, then I can make an "adjustment" and check what breaks, fix it, and move on, but until then, I cannot, I don't like unmapped minefields, and try and not create them. BJ> I'm hopeing to see fido type connections (mailers), maximus, fax and BJ> possibly voice mail handled all via mgetty using a capable modem..... BJ> For max, one will probably be tolled to log into a specific account, BJ> leaving shell logins to linux on other accounts an option. Maximus BJ> uses it's own, internal accounting, and doesn't use the Unix/Linux BJ> UID/GID stuff, and I don't expect that to change, since the intent is BJ> to eventaully have Maximus running under Linux and OS/2, and probably BJ> Win32 systems..... Possibly others if other folks decide to BJ> contribute to porting it. That does make that suggestion rather difficult to implement. RT>> For a mailer use ifcico, or Qico with the above getty's. This RT>> method, is prefered as it allows one to use your com ports with RT>> other programs like minicom or seyom (terminal programs) to RT>> connect to other BBS systems. Comports on Intel systems being RT>> scarce items, and with Linux boxes being able to connect to the RT>> internet via the same ports and modem as the BBS uses, makes RT>> sense. BJ> And is the style I expect for handling the modem.... RT>> BinkleyTerm XE also works a treat, with the exception RT>> that it takes complete RT>> control of the comport, and does not allow it to be RT>> used by other programs RT>> while it is running. To use the comport you have to RT>> kill Binkley, do what you RT>> want to do, and then restart Binkley, which is not RT>> required with the getty's RT>> mentioned above. BJ> I believe BinkleyTerm should be able to be configured to be called BJ> from MGETTY, but I haven't tried that yet. Most folks who come from a BJ> DOS, Win or OS/2 background expect Binkley to run as you have stated, BJ> and have probably brought their control files over from their past BJ> systems, and continue to think in those terms..... But, I thought I BJ> remembered that Binkley could be handed a hot comm port if properly BJ> configured..... That should work with MGETTY, but may need a tweak in BJ> code to handle the intial handshake detection that MGETTY has to BJ> eat..... Hmmm ..., I am not aware of that ability, namely that binkley can, be configured to "take" a hot comm port, from another process, wouldn't make much sense from my point of view, but then, there might be some logic to such madness. :-)) RT>> It might be of value, if you take a look at the way RT>> MBSE BBS'es setup scripts RT>> work, they are quite good, tho not perfect, it might be RT>> educational, then again, it might be "old news". RT>> Hopefully this post makes some sense to all. :-)) BJ> Thanks for the comments..... I don't think it will have an immediate BJ> impact because there are some issues needing to get worked before the BJ> install process gets further tailored..... But I may be wrong about BJ> what Wes and Bo (and others) are currently working on first.... Not expecting anything there soon either, just some thoughts on Maximus on Linux/FreeBSD as a whole, and, I have even less idea how, and on what the other folks involved are doing. BJ> Take care..... You too, friend, Russell --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.4.7* Origin: Rusty's BBS - Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa (5:7105/1) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 7105/1 7106/22 7102/1 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.