Mike Duffy  wrote in
news:m4e93f$oeu$1@dont-email.me: 

> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 01:39:16 +0000 (UTC), Dustin wrote:
> 
>> I suspect that's exactly how things will go down in the event
>> both of us are able to create the md5 hash (oh, my bad, your
>> checksum) 
> 
> Sadly, I agree. And thanks for pointing out that there is a
> difference between "hash" and "checksum". I always thought that
> the two terms were synonymous and needed to look up the (subtle)
> difference. Although, as you say, the MD5 algorithm serves as both
> in my case, this is more because of the manner I want to use it
> than the nature of the algorithm itself. 

Mike that was an interesting reply you got from Dustin. Your plan
has too many holes for me to be interested. Dustin too it seems. 

I don't know much about MD5...... and nor do you the difference
between us is I know my limits and that's why I don't talk about
MD5. Maybe you should do the same. Just saying!

-- 
Jax        
--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2