-={ vrijdag, 11 maart 2016, 16:42:40 +0100 }=-
Hey Kees!
KvE> There is a LATIN-8 in the list of aliases supported by iconv
I only show a LATIN-9 as per;
:read !iconv -l | grep LATIN-[[:digit:]]
LATIN-9//
or
:read !grep LATIN-[[:digit:]] /usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules
alias LATIN-9// ISO-8859-15//
which is more telling methinks.
KvE> and execute iconvconfig to create the cachefile,
KvE> all your pains will be over. ;)
Not my pain. I don't require such a 'fix' but if I did then I'd take it up
with the people responsible for the alias.
For the record, I do see LATIN-1 as a subset of Unicode as well as extended ISO
8859-1 Latin-1 for Windows 3.0 but neither of these show up in the current
version of glibc here which is probably a good thing. :::patent pending:::
KvE> It looks good here, but will probably be a mess when it gets
KvE> converted back to LATIN-1
It looks bad before converting since it never got converted to utf8 in the
first place. I see it here as;
KvE> A Mse once bit my sister...
Note that the characters in question show up in your message as 8 bit
characters and not utf8 ones so the conversion process failed.
I am sure if you convince those truly responsible for ISO standards that the
LATIN-1 alias *should* be attached to ISO-8859-1 then it will be properly taken
care of but I am also sure that it will create a conflict with proprietary
character set(s) already claiming the alias as theirs. Personally I choose to
continue ignoring the issue since I never had an issue with it in the first
place. If it ever matters then LATIN1 works fine and always has for
ISO-8859-1. No?
Life is good,
Maurice
... Don't cry for me I have vi.
--- GNU bash, version 4.3.42(1)-release (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
* Origin: Pointy Stick Society - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001.0)
|