From: "Robert G Lewis" 

Now that is a good question.

I'd say maybe . From what I've seen so far I think the amount of
information readily available for Linux may be greater or easier to find
than for NT. I consider the MS Knowledgebase to be almost useless the last
several times I've tried to use it. When I have looked for information on
the few Linux issues I've had I readily found the information. I have not
used Linux enough yet to have formed a good basis for comparison. How's
that for a weasel answer ?

Of course I haven't found a Geo's Linux Tips or JSI for Linux yet either ,
Both of which have saved me a lot of time 

Bob Lewis


"Geo."  wrote in message news:3de579b7{at}w3.nls.net...
> "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message
> news:3de56230$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> > For me personally a Linux box would not be as secure as a Windows Box at
> the
> > current time. Simply because I don't know Linux well enough to secure
it.
>
> Question, can "secure" be defined as the amount of time each
OS takes to
> learn enough to get to an equal level?
>
> Geo.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4