BJ> Sounds reasonable, but there is something happening where in the OS/2 
 BJ> (and DOS, back when I ran that) where I thought I 
 BJ> could pass some file names with or without the file 
 BJ> extension and Max (or Squish, etc.) would do the 
 BJ> proper thing for appending (or not) the file 
 BJ> extension.  The Linux code is appending the 
 BJ> extention in some cases where it already 
 BJ> exists.....  Maybe my memory on what should be 
 
You know what? I'll bet that the cases where the extra extention is getting
applied is due to an incorrect case-sensitive comparison. I had to make a
*lot* case-sensitivity changes in the code (as scott likes pretty
filenames), it's extremely improbable that I didn't miss a few spots.
 
Wes

--- Maximus/2 3.01