Hello, Maurice.
NB>> I don't seem to have that issue here
MK> Probably the different versions is the reason. Like I said before this
MK> version does the word wrapping correctly except it puts a hard return at
MK> the end of the line where it shouldn't add one at all. I sent a follow up
MK> one with the subject, "man, you been a naughty boy, you let your face grow
MK> long", which applies the 'fix' so that should tell the tale. Also a mess
MK> of utf8 characters on one of the paragraphs just to make it a tad more
MK> difficult. It displays perfect here using 'LANG=en_CA.utf8 fold -s -w
MK> $COLUMNS' on the commandline once all the FTN crap has been sent to the
MK> bitbucket where it belongs. :::evil grin:::
Compiling nano-2.5.3 now. So you may as well inform me of this "fix" you speak
of. :)
NB>> I may get to like vim after all.
MK> It is the best implimentation of vi that there ever was ... possibly ever
MK> will be. Takes a bit of getting used to but definetly is worth the extra
MK> effort ... and then some. There is no better editor.
All I have memorized so far is "Xdd", ":q!", and ":x" which at the moment is
all I need for this messaging stuff so far. I'll get around to learning more
shortly though, I'm sure.
Regards,
Nick
--- SBBSecho 2.33-Linux
* Origin: thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
|