| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Most Unsecure OS? Yep, It`s Linux |
From: "Geo."
How many times have these guys gone over the code in BIND and Sendmail?
Geo.
"Tony Williams" wrote in message
news:3de941a6$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Antti Kurenniemi wrote:
> > "Tony Williams" wrote in message
> > news:3de90000$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >
> >>I chose the words carefully. You have a choice to trust many people
> >>working out in the open and having their efforts publicly reviewed, or
> >>to trust a single source with no third-party corroboration. Either way
> >>you have to trust somebody to not have made a mistake or been malicious
> >>- what's that saying? "Trust, but verify". Closed
source lacks the
> >>"verify" portion.
> >
> >
> > That is true to an extent - for a normal average user the open source
lacks
> > the "verify" as well (who has the knowledge / time to
go find out if
some
> > problem has been fixed in all the millions of lines of code?). So it's a
> > question of who to trust.
> >
>
> Exactly - one vendor who makes claims which can't be independently
> verified or a collection of developers who review each others' work in
> the open (and who often seem to take great delight in striving to outdo
> each other). You might not verify the fix yourself, but you can be sure
> that others have done it for you.
>
> Turn the question on its head: who is it wiser to distrust?
>
> --
> Tony
>
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)SEEN-BY: 3/2 10 106/1 120/544 123/500 379/1 633/260 267 270 285 774/0 605 SEEN-BY: 2432/200 7105/1 @PATH: 379/1 106/1 123/500 774/605 633/260 285 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.