Hello, Maurice.

 MK> Here is an unfixed message using 'nano -$' to show whether or not
 MK> paragraphs are truely unbounded 
 MK> and from this angle it looks as they aren't but won't know for sure until
 MK> I save it. Also I don't 
 MK> have nano replying to messages yet as I hoped to take care of the soft
 MK> wrapping issue first. As 
 MK> for the onscreen look of these posts, they look perfect as they are
 MK> wrapping at word boundaries. 
 MK> However as your quote of the first 'sitting on a corn flake, waiting for
 MK> the van to come' message 
 MK> shows all is not as perfect as it should be.

That's wierd. I don't seem to have that issue here, but I've been invoking nano
with these options: -E -S -R -c -m -d -$

I would assume that the -$ is what's taking care of the softwrap, so I'm unsure
as to why you're having that problem and I'm not?

 MK> Anyhow I still prefer WeBeBashing and vim when it comes to fidonet
 MK> messaging. So far nothing has 
 MK> beaten it but your deployment of nano just might be a winner given the
 MK> online BBS deployment.

I may get to like vim after all. Still using it to reply to this one, and all
seems to be working as expected. :)

Regards,
Nick
--- SBBSecho 2.33-Linux