| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Most Unsecure OS? Yep, It`s Linux |
From: "Rich"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0918_01C2966D.54813230
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
More FUD and lies Mike. Why not make even a token attempt to support =
your false claims?
Rich
"Mike '/m'" wrote in message =
news:s10buu0oib9f4s4skooiur55le8nd53pmb{at}4ax.com...
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:50:16 -0500, "Geo." wrote:
>Back in the NT 3.51 days, NT was by far more secure than any version =
of
>Unix. The reason was because it wasn't mainstream and because it's
>users/admins knew how to configure it.
More than that.
The GDI was not running at ring 0. Microsoft was more concerned about
the NT's "proper architecture" than it was about performance and
features. etc. etc.
=20
Now with the XP eye-candy, securiy has been thrown to the wolves of
the like of RIAA. Mr. Cutler is probably turning over in his
[virtual] grave....
/m
------=_NextPart_000_0918_01C2966D.54813230
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
More FUD and lies =
Mike. Why not=20
make even a token attempt to support your false claims?
Rich
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)SEEN-BY: 3/2 10 106/1 120/544 123/500 379/1 633/260 267 270 285 774/0 605 SEEN-BY: 2432/200 7105/1 @PATH: 379/1 106/1 123/500 774/605 633/260 285 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.