I had thought of just posing this argument/question to Chirnside, but the
rest of you can take a stab at it (not you, Sauer.  You won't have any idea
what I am talking about):

The semi-anual Worldwide AIDS Conference is going on over in Africa right
now with the usual suspects showing up to talk about the disease.  Two of
the standout attendees this year are Bill Gates and Clinton (the imepached,
not the cuckolded wife).

I can understand Gates being there.  From all reports, he is a dedicated
husband and family man without a hint of scandal attached to his name - on
the contrary, he is the world's most generous philanthropists - tapping into
his wealth to fund AIDS education projects.  Gates's involment in the
Conference is perfectly understandable.

But what the hell is Clinton doing there?  AIDS in Africa is predominantly a
sexually transmitted disease.  Lately, the disease has shown up in children,
the victim of rapes perpetrated by infected men who have been lead to
believe by witch doctors that sex with a child will cure them.

What possible good can a diseased sexual predator - Slick Willy - do for
this cause?  Clinton was impeached for lying about a series of trashy sexual
escapades with a fat intern about his daughter's age (including sticking a
cigar in her vagina then sticking it in his mouth and masturbating in the
Oval Office sink).  Clinton is also an accused rapist - a charge he has
never answered - and never will.  During his disgraceful presidency, Slick
would appear before the camera with chancres on his lips - herpes sores that
sock puppet Mike McCurry dismissed as skin cancers (those of us who have
actually had basal cell carcinoma laughed out loud at the idiot flak).

So we got this infected, impeached rapist lecturing people on venereal
disease?  Does anyone but me see the irony in this situation?

--- Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180