| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | QC25 problem |
> To increment the value pointed to by myint, (*myint)++ or > *++myint would do. No, it wouldn't. This doesn't change the precedence and therefore the order of evaluation - you're simply using a prefix increment instead of a postfix. > My practice is when in doubt, use brackets. This does change the order of evaluation and is guaranteed to work. cheers, david PS: Nice to see you're still about at any rate, Nhan. :-) --- SDޝ|Ö(* Origin: Unique Computing Pty Ltd (3:632/348) SEEN-BY: 50/99 54/54 620/243 623/625 630 632/103 301 348 365 386 998 633/371 SEEN-BY: 634/384 635/210 502 503 541 544 636/100 670/206 711/409 430 807 808 SEEN-BY: 711/809 932 934 712/623 713/888 714/906 800/1 @PATH: 632/348 635/503 50/99 54/54 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.