| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: [drakelist] R4C xtal bank bad |
From: Eric Webner Subject: Re: [drakelist] R4C xtal bank bad Eric Webner made an utterence to the drakelist gang ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --0-456259429-1108255182=:80831 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Garey, Several weeks ago when I discovered the play in one of the bandswitch wafers, I set the wafer where it should be and used adhesive on the inner wafer and shaft. It appears to work very well, and with no binding. I wouldn't recommend that for all the wafers, but just one seemed ok. Regarding my low output, I may be ok. First of all, I was not loading it to full power, since one of the errata sheets that Drake put out said to load it for only 340 mA in order to avoid any spurious output. After reading your latest message, I loaded 80 and 40 meters to full power, obtaining 135-140 watts measured on my Bird wattmeter. Loading it to full power ran the plate current to 500 mA! I also took your suggestion and checked a few components. R44, the 680 ohm resistor, is good. The cathode resistors are good and very well balanced. The screen resistors checked out as well. However, the resistor across the meter measured 5.6 ohms. I disconnected one end from the circuit board and the resistor snapped in half. I couldn't come up with another one, so I hope to try a 2.2 ohm unit (measures around 2.6) so I can get on the air this weekend. Do you recommend that I vary the other resistor in order to achieve accuracy on the meter, or can I play around with values on the shunt resistor (the 3.3 ohm resistor)? One other observation: my low power output could be attributed to this meter shunt resistor being off, as that would cause me to back off on the loading quite a bit. This is also why I didn't want to load it to full power (500 ma???) for fear of melting a couple sweep tubes. It also makes me wonder about my bias. Is there a voltage one should shoot for, or is getting the bias (idling) current still the preferable approach? Do I need to realign everything if I need to reset the bias? OK, enough questions for now. Thanks for all the good responses! 73, Eric KA8FAN Garey Barrell wrote: Eric - There isn't a "good" way to correct the wafer "play" once it occurs, short of wafer replacement. I have seen some with very thin Teflon? tape wrapped around the shaft that seemed to work. I saw one where someone had cut small pieces of brass shim stock, carved out the hole, and epoxied them to the wafer. Inexpensive, but highly labor intensive! :-) The Load control should be in the 2.5 - 4.5 range for a non-reactive 50 ohm load. The Plate control should be in the 3 - 8 range. As long as a "dip" can be achieved, it doesn't really matter. Your power output is very low. If you load for maximum output, you should get 130 plus watts out on 80 - 20 in Tune position, 150 -160 watts in CW. Power that low is most likely from weak finals. With "new finals", you probably have an alignment problem. If you have done the alignment, check the 680 ohm resistor at R44, (located under T7, just at the end of the final feedthrough panel under the chassis,) especially if you did the alignment with a metal screwdriver. Shorting the alignment caps to the chassis, hard not to do with a metal screwdriver in those little holes, will damage this resistor. With regard to the plate current, this is most often a result of a meter shunt resistor that has gone up in value. This is a 3.3 ohm resistor on a small board under the chassis near the relay. The 'best" way to correct this is to replace it with a 1W (the original is 1/2W) carbon film resistor. At the same time, check the 15 ohm 1W cathode resistors for the final tubes. They should be close to 15 ohms, (+/- 5%) and closer to each other, (2%). Best replacements are Ohmite OY ceramic composition, although the carbon film types seem to work fine. If you haven't already, check the screen resistors for the finals as well. ---* Origin: The Barter Board Internet Gatway (1:261/1551) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 261/1551 105/1 261/1352 38 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.