On 27 Mar 2005 18:08:29 -0800, "Hyerdahl"  wrote:

>> Oh, come on, hyperdung, just say what you mean: the hard sciences
>have
>> to be changed so females will come out at least superior, hopefully
>on
>> top.
>
>I see no reason at all to "change" the hard sciences.  I do see a
>reason to get rid of sexists who run universities.  Therein you'll find
>the difference.

Garbage. When you think about the persistence of the hard sciences
gap, you'll soon want hard sciences to change. It's inevitable for
your kind--if reality doesn't match your mistaken assumptions, you
want reality to change.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/28/05 12:46:36 AM ---