In article  , USA
  wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 16:11:35 -0600, "HombreVIII"

> wrote:
>
>>
>> wrote in message
>>news:l1cb419i6fr0eh7b8oufeu55btepsu0q9t{at}4ax.com...
>>> All media is left leaning
>>
>>
>>Which explains why the terms "monopoly" and
"anti-competitive" haven't been
>>uttered in a sentence together on television in decades.
>>
>>Hint: The media telling us how extremely left wing it is and that as
>>reasonable people we should always hold a view more right wing than whatever
>>it says does not make it true.
>>
>>http://www.bartcop.com/libmedia.htm
>>
> What a lame site.
>
> Other favorite liberal arguments go something like:
>
> "GE is a huge evil corporation and it owns NBC so obviously
> conservatives (the big corporation) are in control of the media."
>
> If that were true there would be no fag shows or fag anything on Bravo
> (a cable channel owned and run by NBC). But there are plenty of such
> trashy crap shows in evidence.  For example, ever hear of "Queer Eye
> for the Straight Guy"?  Or how about the NBC show "Will and
Grace"?
> These days a homo is inserted into every TV show almost as if every
> family has one of their own which is far from accurate.

Why you obsessed on fags, USA? Have you been raped by a fag? Had a boyfriend
stolen by a fag? Had to compete with a fag for a girl? I'll bet no. So why
do you CARE that Bravo shows things like Queer Eye? If you don't like it,
don't watch! I'm going to make a guess that the network didn't make these
shows for viewers like you in the first place.

The OLN has turkey hunting on. Now there's something that is more what you
might like.
>
> If conservatives were doing the hands on running of either the
> entertainment or news departments of the alphabet networks and their
> cable clones, you wouldn't hear the words gay, lesbian, or homosexual
> and you certainly wouldn't see any.

And people would be bored to death with the "Leave It To Beaver" - type
shows that'd be on the air. Tell me, PAX has a whole bunch of 'family safe'
non-gay programming on it's network. Can you name any of those shows? I
can't.
>
> Why does GE let liberals run NBC news and entertainment divisions?
> Because they are still making big money.  When that ceases to be true
> we might see a change.  In light of what happened with idiot Dan
> Rather, it seems Viacom is starting to pay attention to how costly CBS
> News is to run because it has virtually no ratings.  Even so they
> won't become a conservative run news division but rather CBS News will
> probably pretty much cease to exist.  Hopefully NBC and ABC will
> follow shortly there after.

From what I hear, alot of the network news departments are getting fed up
with being cobbled to the entertainment departments in their respective
networks. At this point where they are driven by ratings, money concerns
drive the news to be very mediocre. Peter Jennings recently spoke out about
this. Funny thing is, some of the most conservative news reporting, in that
it is the least 'hollywood' glam spun out, is ironically, shows like The
News Hour on PBS..



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/27/05 12:46:32 PM ---