JD>  WL> I will shortly be designing a web page for a company.  I'd like to 
tak
JD>  WL> advantage of DHTML and CSS, but I'm not sure whether "everyone" 
suppor
JD>  WL> version 4 of Netscape and Microsoft's seperate browsers.
JD> 
JD>  WL> Should I do a different page for versions 3 and 4 - or stick with 4, 
a
JD>  WL> wait for everyone to make the jump?
JD> 
JD>  WL> I'd be interested for your comments,
JD> 
JD> It depends on who you think your audience is. There are a lot of people 
out
JD> there running older versions of IE and Netscape because they're still 
runni
JD> 386's and slow 486's. There is also still a significant number of people
JD> running text based browsers like lynx. Two sets of pages; one with 
everythi
JD> the other with minimal graphics (or liberal use of ALT) and no frames.
I agree on the 2 different pages.   I use Netscape 3.04 despite the fact that 
i'm on an AMD K6-233 MMX with 64 meg of ram.  If someone's JUST looking for 
info... they're likely to go for the "stripped" version of the web page, i do 
that alot anyway, even though i've got tons of plugins (bleh).  If they want 
to be impressed by the company then they'll go for the "enhanced" version of 
the page.  if he's comfortable with it, then he might want to have the page 
auto detect the browser.
Lou
--- Renegade v10-05 Exp
---------------